To the Editor:
I would like to thank Mr. (Tony) Marconi for his recent heartfelt critique of me. The patron saint of his beloved progressive liberal Democrat Party, Harry Reid, could not have better demonstrated how they fear real debate, and will use such tactics to avoid it. They do so because they know their agenda cannot be defended by anyone but the politically uninformed, who only hear their false promises, and pay no heed to the results of their past actions, or their effect on them. It’s like they are standing face to face with a pickpocket, intently listening to his promise that he is going to give them something for free, while he is emptying their pockets to pay for it.
He refuses to debate me further because he says I argue like a child – not his true reason. He admitted defeat in our first round of debates, and fears that he’ll lose again, demonstrating his lack of self-confidence in his ability to sell his progressive liberal candy to a “child.” His accusation that I see a threat in everything progressive, is true, because there is, as can easily be seen by anyone interested in looking into the history of the success rate of their past actions, as relates to the people, not the progressive liberal Democrat Party. I was guilty of such self-induced political blindness until President Carter cured me of it. I was blind, but now I can see.
Mr. Marconi seems to believe that all it takes to be a good president is to win the election. Well, George W. Bush did, contrary to the progressive liberal Democrat Party’s lies that it was stolen, and I’ll bet the farm he doesn’t think he was a good president. The ONLY reason President Obama was able to win two elections was because of the suckers that either thought that they were going to get something for free, or that they were going to provide it to someone for free, through the government. Either way, Obama worked, like the snake-oil salesman that he is, to sell it to them, and like the pickpocket he is, picked their own pockets to pay for it. He definitely can multi-task.
As for his next-to-last paragraph, it demonstrates one of the favorite tactics of progressives of purposely taking one’s words out of context. My invitation to him to leave the country and go to one that has a government that more closely resembles the one he desires for America, was strictly for his own education, to see just how progressive dictatorships work for their people. Kind of like test-driving a car before you buy it. My invitation to him to renounce his citizenship was likewise for his education so that he could experience how those who enter this country legally, seeking citizenship, and go through the legal process to get it, must feel when seeing all those who are entering illegally are given instant citizenship. A wise man wouldn’t burn his old house to the ground, without first examining his new one. …